Los Angeles DUI
Los Angeles DUI Lawyer
Los Angeles DUI Attorney Law Firm Overview DUI Defense G & W Profiles California DUI Case Results Testimonials from Clients we've Defended Frequently Asked DUI Questions Contact Us
Watch our Informational DUI Defense Videos Instant Callback from Our Office DUI Defense Blog
Recent Posts
Categories
Archives
Areas of DUI Defense
You are in:
DUI Defense
Introduction
DUI Defense
DUI Overview
DUI Court Process
DMV Hearings
DUI Penalties
DUI Recommendations
Multiple DUI Arrests
Felony DUI
Under 21 DUI
Criminal Case
DUI Auto Accidents
DUI Causing Injury
Vehicular Manslaughter
Out of State Arrests
Drugs & DUI Arrests
Field Sobriety Tests
Breathalyzer Test
Blood Tests
Breath Test Refusals
DUI Expungements
Sobriety Checkpoints
Unlawful Police Stops
DUI Statistics
DUI Attorney Videos
DUI Attorney Videos
DUI Attorney Videos
DUI Attorney Videos




Representing Clients in ALL Los Angeles, CA Courts

Los Angeles DUI Attorney Blog

« Out of State License | Main  | Caller's Tips and DUI Stops »
  DUI Refusal Case Dismissed
Sometimes it pays to refuse to submit to a chemical test. My DUI case in West Covina Court this morning was dismissed by the prosecutor based on a lack of evidence of impairment.

Ofcourse, the law in California is that a suspect lawfully arrested for a DUI impliedly consents to a breath or blood test and has no right of refusal. The stakes are higher in refusal cases as the DMV suspension for DUI is much longer and the Court will impose greater penalties including some jail time in the event of a conviction. It is therefore, generally better to cooperate and submit to a test than refuse. In some jurisdictions, particularly in Orange County, arresting agencies take a blood sample by force in the event of a refusal. The law allows reasonable force in the taking of a blood sample without consent.

In my case, my client performed well on field sobriety tests, and the evidence of impairment was weak. My client refused because he had been given inaccurate advice from another attorney in the past that this is what he should do in the event of an arrest. I believe that had my client consented to a test, based on his drinking pattern, he would have been under the legal limit and may not have been charged in the first place. However, it is still not easy to obtain dismissals as prosecutors are always open to criticism for being lenient. It is much easier for a prosecutor to be tough and insist on DUI penalties in refusal cases.

I stilll have the problem of dealing with my clients DMV case. The lack of evidence of impairment will not help there as it is not an issue that the DMV has to prove in a refusal case. The only argument I have relates to the legality of the arrest based on the good performance of field sobriety tests, although the police do not need much to justify an initial arrest. My client will probably end up with a one year license suspension even though he will not have a DUI on his record.
Categories: Los Angeles DUI

Posted By Gold & Witham on October 20, 2009 11:12 am | Permalink 

Don’t take any chances with your driving privileges, and don’t risk spending time in jail! Contact a Los Angeles DUI Attorney now at Gold & Witham, Attorneys at Law to find out how we can help you reclaim your most important possession: your peace of mind.

DUI Lawyer
California DUI Defense Information Center
Watch our DUI Defense Videos Instant Callback Los Angeles DUI Lawyer Long Beach DUI Lawyer
Los Angeles Defense Attorney Torrance DUI Lawyer
Orange County DUI Attorney DMV Hearings Defense